Error message

  • Deprecated function: implode(): Passing glue string after array is deprecated. Swap the parameters in drupal_get_feeds() (line 394 of /home/htdocs/kim63/html/includes/common.inc).
  • Deprecated function: The each() function is deprecated. This message will be suppressed on further calls in menu_set_active_trail() (line 2405 of /home/htdocs/kim63/html/includes/menu.inc).
2010 and earlier
Article
Weike, A. I., Schupp, H. T., Hamm, A. O.

In dubio pro defensio: Initial activation of conditioned fear is not cues specific

Weike, A. I., Schupp, H. T., Hamm, A. O. (2008). In dubio pro defensio: Initial activation of conditioned fear is not cues specific. Behavioral Neuroscience, 122, 685–696. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.122.3.685

This study explored the time course of conditioned fear response expression. Two neutral male facial expressions served as conditioned stimuli (CS) in a differential trace conditioning that involved either an aversive (n = 14) or a nonaversive (n = 12) unconditioned stimulus (UCS) in a between-subjects design. Skin conductance response (SCR) to the CSs and startle response magnitudes to acoustic probes presented at early (250 ms) or late (1,750 ms) probe times after CS onset were measured. As expected, conditioned SCR discrimination was observed in both aversive and nonaversive learning, whereas the conditioned potentiation of the startle response was only observed for the aversive UCS condition. Interestingly, conditioned startle discrimination was specific for the later probe time. In contrast, conditioned fear potentiation of the startle response at the early probe time was equally pronounced for CS+ and CS-. These findings suggest that fear-eliciting neural structures are rapidly activated in fear learning, whereas the expression of inhibitory conditioning requires more time, presumably reflecting the involvement of cortical top down control processes.